What is fracking? Why is it such a hot topic in the media today?
Is it a good thing? Do the risks outweigh the rewards? My name is
Seth Trammell. I'm a freshman student at Kansas State University, and
I am majoring in chemistry. I currently hope to work in the energy
business after I graduate, hopefully in the oil and natural gas
industry.
Naturally, I would like to know if the industry I hope to
work in is hurting the environment. In this blog, I will try and
answer a few questions about fracking and the oil industry in
general. I am not completely sure where I'll end up, but I hope that
by the end of the journey I will have reached at least a few
conclusions. I hope to remain unbiased as well, but that might be
difficult because I am currently in favor of fracking. In this post,
I will try to give a basic overview on what fracking is and why it is
a controversial topic right now.
Okay, so what is fracking? Thankfully, there are not any
arguments about this question! Fracking is a shorthand of “hydraulic
fracturing.” It is a method of drilling into tight rock formations,
especially shale, in order to harvest the oil and natural gas located
there. Shale is a mud that is composed of clay and small portions of
minerals such as quarts and calcite, and it is usually at least a
mile below the surface. The process begins by drilling a well
straight down into the shale and then continuing to drill for several
thousand feet at a nearly horizontal angle. After the drilling is
complete, a mixture of water, sand, and a small amount of additives
is pumped into the well at a high pressure. This causes tiny
fractures in the rock (hence the name), which causes the oil and
natural gas inside the rock to be released and flood into the well.
It usually takes between one million and eight million gallons of
water to complete a fracturing job.
It is not too complicated of an idea to understand, but you might
still be wondering why fracking is so popular. What are the benefits?
Fracking lets oil companies reach oil and natural gas reserves that
are difficult to reach, and it allows each well to be more
productive. It is estimated that as high as eighty percent of the oil
and natural gas reserves in the United States can only be reached
using hydraulic fracturing. Most energy companies claim that fracking
will offer around one hundred years of oil and natural gas security
for the United States and Canada. Since it allows energy companies to
tap large reserves of oil and natural gas, hydraulic fracturing also
helps keep the price of domestic oil and natural gas low.
Obviously, you can see that there are benefits to hydraulic
fracturing. So what is all the fuss about? Well here is where it gets
a little bit more complicated. Very little unbiased research has been
done into what the environmental repercussions of fracking actually
are, so I'll give a few claims from both sides of the argument. Most
oil and natural gas companies agree that there are a few ways that
fracking impact the environment negatively. However, they would also
claim that hydraulic fracturing does not cause any more damage than
regular oil and gas drilling, which does not seem to be an issue for
most people. The opposition to fracking might point out that it takes
about 72 trillion gallons of water to run all the wells currently in
the United States and Canada. They also claim that the chemical
additives used in the fracking fluid are extremely harmful to the
environment. Some studies have shown that methane concentrations in
wells near fracking sites contain up to seventeen times the usual
concentration of methane. They might also say that known carcinogens
such as uranium, mercury, and lead are used in the fracking fluid.
The problem that I've found so far is that both sides of the
argument are extremely biased. The oil and gas companies have studies
they can point to that claim to prove that hydraulic fracturing is no
more harmful to the environment than regular drilling. The activists
against hydraulic fracturing, however, also have studies they can
point to that claim to prove exactly the opposite. My goal in this
blog is to provide a window into both sides of the argument and at
least come up with an unbiased conclusion.
Seth,
ReplyDeleteWhat the hell is wrong with people? Why can't there just be unbiased facts anymore? I've heard (and like yourself I can't confirm the validity) that the small earth quakes in KS and OK are because the shale is being damaged in enough places to cause massive subterranean collapse, i.e earthquakes. Do you suppose the earthquakes are bad for the environment too? Prairie grass and crops will probably be okay but there are lots of tunneling animals on the plains.
Hey Seth,
ReplyDeleteI didn't know much about fracking before reading you post! I appreciate you incorporating both the pros and cons of this popular method of drilling to enlighten those of us without a lot of previous knowledge on the subject!